26.02 Ablation of Prominin-1 Hepatic Cells After Bile Duct Ligation Mitigates Pro-Fibrobrogenic Expression

M. R. Fenlon1, N. Malkoff1, J. Xu1, E. Mahdi1, A. Glazier1, C. Lee1, R. Oweis1, K. Asahina2, K. S. Wang1  1Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles,Surgery,Los Angeles, CA, USA 2Keck School of Medicine,Pathology,Los Angeles, CA, USA

Introduction:
Biliary Atresia (BA) is the most common cause of end-stage liver failure in children. The expansion of intrahepatic ductular reactions (DR), comprised of reactive cholangiocytes, has been strongly linked to liver fibrosis, and correlates with progression toward cirrhosis post-Kasai portoenterostomy. We previously demonstrated the expansion of Prominin-1 (Prom1)-expressing hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs) within DR and evolving fibrosis in BA. Curiously, while null mutation of Prom1 leads to decreased DR and fibrosis in a murine model of BA induced by Rhesus rotavirus, targeted ablation of preexisting Prom1+ HPCs in adult mice undergoing bile duct ligation (BDL) does not. We therefore hypothesized that de-novo Prom1 expression following HPC activation, is responsible for fibroblastic activation in cholestatic liver injury.

Methods:
Adult C57BL6 mice (8-10 weeks) were bred to heterozygosity for Prom1-Cre/ERT2 and ROSA-lsl-Diphtheria Toxin A (DTA). BDL vs sham laparotomy (day 0) was performed to induce cholestatic liver injury. DTA-mediated targeted ablation of all cells expressing Prom1 was accomplished by tamoxifen (TAM)-dependent Cre recombination. Intraperitoneal TAM vs corn oil control (Oil) was administered either day -7 (Pre-BDL) to target preexisting Prom1-expressing HPCs or day +2 (Post-BDL) to target all cells expressing Prom1, including those with de novo expression. At day +10, whole liver RNA was collected for gene expression analysis with quantitative PCR. ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey test was used for statistical analysis (α <0.05 significance).

Results:

With all experimental conditions, BDL-injured mice developed the characteristic weight loss, extra-hepatic biliary dilation, ascites and jaundice. Neither pre- nor post-Sham Prom1-expressing cell ablation significantly altered gene expression compared to Oil Sham. Pre-BDL Prom1-expressing cell ablation increased fibroblastic αSMA and Vimentin expression compared to Pre-Sham (30.5±30.6 vs 0.3±0.2, p<0.01, 10.4±5.3 vs 1.3±0.7 [WK1] [FM2] p<0.001, mean±SD, N=8) whereas Post-BDL ablation (compared to post-Sham) did not (3.8±2.3 vs 2.8±1.3, 1.1±0.4 vs 1.0±0.7, 2.9±0.9 vs 1.5±0.5, all p>0.05, N=9). Moreover, Post-BDL expression of Ck19, αSMA, and Vimentin was significantly lower compared to Pre-BDL groups (3.8±2.3 v 29.6±27.0, p<0.01, 1.1±0.4 v 30.5±30.6, p<0.001, 2.6±0.9 v 10.4±5.3 p<0.001, N=9).

Conclusion:
Post-injury Prom1-expressing cell ablation mitigates the characteristic fibroblastic upregulation of cholestatic liver injury, whereas pre-injury ablation does not. This suggests that a de novo population of Prom1-expressing cells, but not preexisting Prom1-HPCs, are involved in cholestatic liver fibrosis. Further characterization of this cellular population may identify actionable pathways in the treatment of BA.