13.18 Body Mass Index is Associated with Surgical Site Infection (SSI) In Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

M. M. Romine1,2, A. Gullick1,2, M. Morris1,2, L. Goss1,2, D. Chu1,2  1University Of Alabama at Birmingham,Gastrointestinal Surgery,Birmingham, Alabama, USA 2VA Birmingham HealthSystem,General Surgery,Birmingham, AL, USA

Introduction:
Controversy persists on the association of Body Mass Index (BMI) with SSI in patients with IBD. Previous studies have been limited by single-institution populations and mixing of Crohn’s disease and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) patients. In this study, we aim to use a national dataset to investigate the association of BMI with SSI specifically in patients with UC. We hypothesize that higher BMI is associated with higher risk for SSI.

Methods:
Using the 2012-2014 ACS-NSQIP Procedure Targeted Database, we identified all patients with UC who underwent colectomy between 2012-2014. Patients with UC were stratified by weight status to underweight, normal weight, overweight and BMI class I (30-34.9), II (35-39.9) and III (>40). Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities and surgical characteristics were compared. Primary outcomes were wound complications (SSI, organ space SSI, anastomotic leaks) and secondary outcomes were other reported NSQIP-complications. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors for wound complications.

Results:
Of 1,487 patients with UC, 39.8% were classified as normal weight as compared to 25.4%, 14.9%, 6.59% and 3.43% for overweight, BMI class I, II and III, respectively. Overall, 10.96% of patients were smokers, 9% of patients were diabetic and 65.77% of patients were on steroids or other immunosuppressant. Patients with higher BMI class were more likely to have diabetes: 6.31% in class I, 10.2% in class II and 13.73% in class III (p value <0.001). At time of surgery, a larger percentage of class III obese patients (27.45%) were classified as ASA 4-5 (p value <0.001). Higher BMI was associated with greater rates of SSI: 7.25% in normal weight class, 8.7% in the overweight class, 9.01% in class I, 18.37% in class II and 27.45% in class III (p-value<0.001). There was no significant difference in organ space SSI (range: 3.92-7.94%) and anastomotic leaks (range: 1.35-6.12%) between the BMI classes (p>0.05). There was an increase in sepsis rate (33.3% vs 15.3%] and respiratory complication rates (23.5% vs 10.2%) with BMI class III vs BMI class II and  continued to decrease with the lower classes (p-value<0.001). On adjustment for covariate differences, BMI remained a significant predictor for SSI with the highest odds in class III (OR 5.0 CI 2.5-10.2) and Class II obesity (OR 3.5 CI 1.9-6.4) when compared to normal BMI individuals.

Conclusion:
Patients with UC and high BMI are at the highest risk for SSI but not for organ space SSI or anastomotic leak rates. Targeting BMI with weight-loss strategies may be one actionable opportunity to reduce post-operative SSI rates.