55.05 Prognostic Properties of KRAS Gene Mutation Subtypes in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

F. Nusrat1, A. Nevler2, E. Gorgov2, O. Isesele1, A. Khanna1, W. Bowne2, C. Yeo2, A. Jain2, H. Lavu2  1Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA 2Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary And Related Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Introduction:

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and therapy-resistant cancer, making it among the most lethal of all major cancers. PDAC has a distinct genomic profile, with somatic KRAS proto-oncogene mutations in 85% – 95% of PDAC cases. This study aimed to measure the prognostic impact of specific KRAS mutations in resected PDAC patients from a large, high-volume tertiary referral center.

Methods:

This retrospective study included a cohort of 315 evaluable PDAC patients who underwent curative-intent pancreatic resection at our institution between 2016 – 2021. Demographic, histologic, and oncologic outcome data were recorded. Metastatic and non-PDAC cases with perioperative mortality were excluded. Genetic data from surgical specimens were obtained from next-generation sequencing assays in mutation-prone regions of the KRAS gene on chromosome 12p, including the hotspot codons 12, 13, and 61.

Results:

There were 295 patients (93.7%) with at least one KRAS mutation, of which 8 patients (2.5%) had more than one mutation. By mutation subtype, the cohort included 129 KRAS G12D (41.0%), 46 KRAS G12R (14.6%), 96 KRAS G12V (30.5%), and 12 KRAS Q61H (3.8%) patients. The median overall survival (OS) of the cohort was 33.2 ± 3.1 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed KRAS mutational status to be associated with significant variability in overall survival: wild-type KRAS (WT-KRAS) with a median OS of 68.5 months; G12R with a median OS of 41.9 ± 7.8 months; G12D/G12V and Q61H with a median OS of 29.9 ± 3.3 months and 29.3 ± 3.5 months, respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed worse survival with increased age and the presence of perineural and lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.05). Patients with either KRAS G12D or KRAS G12V were correlated with worse overall survival (HR 2.5, P = 0.041) compared to those with WT-KRAS, as shown in Figure 1. KRAS Q61H, while not significant, also trended toward conferring worse survival compared to WT-KRAS (HR 2.7, P = 0.114). KRAS G12R did not significantly differ in survival compared to WT-KRAS (HR 1.5, P = 0.476).

Conclusion:

In resected PDAC patients, KRAS G12D and KRAS G12V mutations were associated with worse overall survival compared to WT-KRAS, whereas KRAS G12R was not significantly different than WT-KRAS.