J. B. Imran1, C. T. Minshall1, T. Madni1, A. El Mokdad1, M. Subramanian1, A. Clark1, H. Phelan1, M. Cripps1 1University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,Surgery,Dallas, TX, USA
Introduction: Complicated appendicitis (CA) is defined by the presence of perforation or abscess during appendectomy. This definition guides clinical assessment and has a profound impact on postoperative antibiotic use and hospital length of stay. Despite its utilization, the intraoperative (IO) assessment of CA is fraught with subjectivity. Although histopathologic (HP) diagnosis should be the gold standard in identifying patients with CA, it is not immediately available after an operation to guide postoperative management. Given the subjectivity in the IO assessment and delay in obtaining an HP diagnosis, the objective of this study was to identify predictors of an HP diagnosis of CA.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent appendectomy at our institution from 2011 to 2013. Patients were divided into cohorts consisting of those with CA or uncomplicated appendicitis (UA) based on an HP diagnosis. CA was defined by finding evidence of macroscopic or microscopic perforation or abscess on pathology report. Clinical, IO, and postoperative data were compared using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. We evaluated predictors of an HP diagnosis of CA using a multivariable logistic regression model.
Results: A total of 239 out of 1066 patients had CA based on IO assessment, while only 143 out of 239 patients (60%) had both an HP and IO diagnosis of CA. On univariate analysis, older patients, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, those with a longer duration of pain prior to presentation, the presence of an appendicolith, abscess and appendix size on preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging, as well as higher median preoperative temperature and serum creatinine were found to have significant differences between complicated and uncomplicated cohorts diagnosed by HP (p < .05). Patients with an HP diagnosis of CA also had less focal right lower quadrant pain and an increased time from presentation to the operating room than those with UA (p < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed that an IO diagnosis of CA was found to be associated with an HP diagnosis of CA (OR 12.32; 95% CI, 8.2 – 18.5). Other risk factors were age (per 10 years; OR 1.25; 95% CI, 1.07 – 1.46), number of days of pain (OR 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07 – 1.37), appendix size (per millimeter; OR 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07 – 1.37), and the presence of an appendicolith (OR 1.65; 95% CI, 1.06 – 2.56) on preoperative CT imaging.
Conclusion: Age, duration of pain, appendix size and the presence of an appendicolith on preoperative imaging are moderately associated with having an HP diagnosis of CA. The IO assessment is also associated with an HP diagnosis of CA; however 40% of patients were classified incorrectly at the time of surgery. These predictors in combination with improved intraoperative grading could be used to achieve a more timely and accurate diagnosis of CA.