S. Sprinkle1, B. Harris2, A. Wang1, H. Leraas1, J. Migaly1 1Duke University Medical Center,Department Of Surgery,Durham, NC, USA 2Temple University,School Of Medicine,Philadelpha, PA, USA
Introduction:
When choosing a specialty, mentorship is exceedingly important. This is especially true for female medical students contemplating a future in general surgery. Clerkship directors (CD) are important initial role models for medical students. However, no data currently exists on how many CDs are female surgeons. We sought to determine the demographics of this important educational leadership role.
Methods:
A list of medical schools was obtained from the Liaison Council of Medical Education (LCME) and was current as of June 2016. Forty percent of the institutions were selected by simple random sample. For those selected, institutional websites were evaluated for clerkship director’s gender, academic rank (assistant, associate, or professor), sub-specialty training, and year of residency graduation. Secondary internet searches were made if any data was missing. The 2014 gender distributions of surgical residents and faculty were obtained from publically available census reports. SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC) was used to perform chi-squared tests on categorical data and Mann-Whitney tests on skewed continuous data. Faculty rank was treated as an ordinal variable and modeled using an ordered logistic regression. As only publically available data was queried, this study was exempt from institutional review.
Results:
Of 146 LCME medical schools, 57 (40%) were sampled, representing 22 different states. Of this sample, 24.6% of CDs were women (14/57, p<0.0001). The number of female CDs was not statistically different from the 2014 proportion of female faculty in general surgery (894/4455, 19.8%), p=0.4. However, the proportion of female CDs was statistically different from the 2014 proportion of female residents (2962/7890, 37.3%, p=0.04) and medical students (37196/78945, 47.1%), p<0.001.
The median year of graduation from residency for women was 2003 (range 1978-2013) compared to 2001 (1968-2012) for men (p=0.3). The majority of female CDs were assistant professors (50.0%, 7/14) with 28.7 % reaching the rank of associate (4/14) and 21.4% (3/14) full professors. Although the majority of male CDs held the rank of associate professor (35.1%, 20/43), there was no significant difference in the proportion of academic ranks by gender. On logistic regression, gender was not a significant contributor to faculty rank (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-3.6). However, years since residency graduation was a significant contributor to faculty rank (AOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.4, p<0.0001).
Conclusion:
In this random sample of medical schools, the proportion of female CDs does not vary significantly from the overall proportion of female faculty in general surgery. Although women in academic medicine experience slower rates of advancement, this does not seem to be the case for CDs. It is possible educational leadership positions mitigate discrepancies in faculty advancement, and future work should evaluate that possibility further.