N. Frohne1, M. Sarap1, A. Alseidi2, L. Buckingham1, P. P. Parikh1 1Wright State University,Department Of Surgery,Dayton, OH, USA 2Virginia Mason Medical Center,Seattle, WA, USA
Introduction: There is a growing deficit of rural general surgeons and preparation to meet this need is inadequate. Further, there is limited data focusing on the factors of rural general surgery training that surgeon’s use to decide on practijce location. More research into stratifying factors that specifically influence choice in rural versus urban practice is needed.
Methods: Rural was defined as a population of less than 50,000 per the U.S Census Bureau. An IRB approved Qualtrics survey was distributed to general surgeons and surgery residents nationwide through the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and American College of Osteopathic Surgeons (ACOS). This completely voluntary survey included questions related to prior rural experience, reasons for selecting or not selecting rural practice, and factors that could increase rural retention. Further, the respondents were requested to provide narrative comments on how to improve recruitment and retention of rural surgeons. The responses were analyzed for themes using constant comparative method.
Results: Out of total 416 respondents, 74% were male. Further, 287(69%) respondents had previous exposure to rural surgery (Fig1). Of those with prior rural experience, 71 (25%) chose or would not choose to not continue with a rural career due to lack of professional/hospital support and lifestyle of a rural surgeon. Other reasons such as job opportunities, specialty practice, and no opportunities for teaching or pursuing academic surgery also hindered their choice of considering rural surgery career. A broad scope of practice was most important among rural surgeons (52%) who chose rural practice without any previous rural experience. Over 60% of respondents without prior rural experience agreed that improved lifestyle and financial advantages would attract them to rural practice. Thematic analysis suggests that more tie ups with academic institutions, more support from the rural hospitals, rural rotations earlier in training, more mentoring and rural surgeon as a role model would help increase the number of rural surgeons.
Conclusion: Our results help focus specific resources in the rural setting. Providing appropriate hospital support in these areas and promoting specific aspects of rural practice to those in training could help grow interest in rural surgery. Strong collaboration with academic institutions for teaching, learning and mentoring opportunities for rural surgeons could lead to higher satisfaction, security, and potentially higher retention rate. A rural surgeon mentor would further influence the choice of practice location. Improving rural economic factors can provide some of the larger urban center qualities in a rural setting that may appeal to urban leaning surgeons.